<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon SD1100 vs Kodak m1033 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/27/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/27/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-review/</link>
	<description>Technology, Sports, Life, and Travel - Starring Shawn</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:06:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nike Air Max 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/27/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-review/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Nike Air Max 2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansepar.com/?p=92#comment-641</guid>
		<description>I am have to verify with you here. Which is not something I normally do! I get pleasure from studying a submit that may make individuals think. Additionally, thanks for permitting me to comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am have to verify with you here. Which is not something I normally do! I get pleasure from studying a submit that may make individuals think. Additionally, thanks for permitting me to comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wanas</title>
		<link>http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/27/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-review/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>wanas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansepar.com/?p=92#comment-244</guid>
		<description>I think this review is not fair enough, your standing on canon side more, maybe you dont know how to take good photos with this camera for that you got poor quality pix.

I think I will buy m1033 too ;), its great camera I think.

see this expert review if you want to know how is the m1033 quality http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-cameras/kodak-easyshare-m1033-black/4505-6501_7-32788134.html?tag=mncol;lst</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this review is not fair enough, your standing on canon side more, maybe you dont know how to take good photos with this camera for that you got poor quality pix.</p>
<p>I think I will buy m1033 too <img src='http://www.jansepar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> , its great camera I think.</p>
<p>see this expert review if you want to know how is the m1033 quality <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-cameras/kodak-easyshare-m1033-black/4505-6501_7-32788134.html?tag=mncol;lst" rel="nofollow">http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-cameras/kodak-easyshare-m1033-black/4505-6501_7-32788134.html?tag=mncol;lst</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james2k50</title>
		<link>http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/27/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-review/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>james2k50</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansepar.com/?p=92#comment-235</guid>
		<description>I agree with ernest, the Kodak is the better camera in this case. I have been seeing that Kodak is making a strong comeback. Many are beginning to see this and deciding to buy a Kodak again.. Good work for you Kodak :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with ernest, the Kodak is the better camera in this case. I have been seeing that Kodak is making a strong comeback. Many are beginning to see this and deciding to buy a Kodak again.. Good work for you Kodak <img src='http://www.jansepar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernest</title>
		<link>http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/27/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-review/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansepar.com/?p=92#comment-233</guid>
		<description>For example:

Canon: http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/6138/59680378.jpg 
vs kodak: http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/6072/82451091.jpg

Canon: http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/8865/34549138.jpg 
vs kodak: http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/716/43693635.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For example:</p>
<p>Canon: <a href="http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/6138/59680378.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/6138/59680378.jpg</a><br />
vs kodak: <a href="http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/6072/82451091.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/6072/82451091.jpg</a></p>
<p>Canon: <a href="http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/8865/34549138.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/8865/34549138.jpg</a><br />
vs kodak: <a href="http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/716/43693635.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/716/43693635.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/27/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-review/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansepar.com/?p=92#comment-232</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve looked at them very closely, its clear that Canon is much higher quality, I really dont know what your looking at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve looked at them very closely, its clear that Canon is much higher quality, I really dont know what your looking at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernest</title>
		<link>http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/27/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-review/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansepar.com/?p=92#comment-231</guid>
		<description>when i read this review i was convinced to buy the kodak m1033, because of the two pairs of samples shown, kodak has better quality(try to zoom on the pics), and you only say canon is better, canon is better, canon is better, canon is better... have you seen the pics you shot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when i read this review i was convinced to buy the kodak m1033, because of the two pairs of samples shown, kodak has better quality(try to zoom on the pics), and you only say canon is better, canon is better, canon is better, canon is better… have you seen the pics you shot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merlit Matos</title>
		<link>http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/27/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-review/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlit Matos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansepar.com/?p=92#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking about buy a Canon SD1100, i don&#039;t know if it&#039;s better than the Kodak, but i prefer Canon because have imagine stabilizer system. That&#039;s amazing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m thinking about buy a Canon SD1100, i don’t know if it’s better than the Kodak, but i prefer Canon because have imagine stabilizer system. That’s amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

