<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon SD1100 vs Kodak m1033 Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/15/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/15/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-preview/</link>
	<description>Technology, Sports, Life, and Travel - Starring Shawn</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:06:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.jansepar.com/2008/12/15/canon-sd1100-vs-kodak-m1033-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansepar.com/?p=87#comment-207</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, I have a Canon SD 800 IS (which I suppose is a direct predecessor of the 1100).  I like it a lot.

It takes really nice pictures: the image stabilization and colour reproduction are both good.  The autofocus is probably as fast as my SLR.

If I was buying another compact, it would be Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it’s worth, I have a Canon SD 800 IS (which I suppose is a direct predecessor of the 1100).  I like it a lot.</p>
<p>It takes really nice pictures: the image stabilization and colour reproduction are both good.  The autofocus is probably as fast as my SLR.</p>
<p>If I was buying another compact, it would be Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

